WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.742 align:center
wherever you might be I am

00:00:01.802 --> 00:00:05.185 align:center
just checking here the live stream

00:00:05.285 --> 00:00:08.548 align:center
coming up on the site and

00:00:08.668 --> 00:00:10.330 align:center
it should be fine let me

00:00:10.430 --> 00:00:12.652 align:center
make sure just waiting one second

00:00:12.752 --> 00:00:15.255 align:center
here all right well it's still

00:00:15.315 --> 00:00:16.015 align:center
retry I

00:00:19.419 --> 00:00:19.959 align:center
think you are in

00:00:19.999 --> 00:00:22.161 align:center
the right place I am streaming

00:00:22.282 --> 00:00:25.525 align:center
then just took a second okay

00:00:25.565 --> 00:00:27.266 align:center
was not showing up yet on

00:00:27.326 --> 00:00:28.688 align:center
the on the page let me

00:00:28.728 --> 00:00:30.369 align:center
kind of refresh the page just

00:00:30.389 --> 00:00:31.090 align:center
in case

00:00:34.680 --> 00:00:35.882 align:center
Okay, hello.

00:00:37.384 --> 00:00:38.265 align:center
Oh yeah, there I am.

00:00:38.405 --> 00:00:39.086 align:center
That's all good.

00:00:39.166 --> 00:00:40.348 align:center
I think we're good to go.

00:00:40.368 --> 00:00:44.153 align:center
And hi, it's Jovino Santos Neto

00:00:44.213 --> 00:00:46.076 align:center
here for Piano Groove.

00:00:46.096 --> 00:00:47.418 align:center
And today we're going to talk

00:00:47.498 --> 00:00:48.580 align:center
about ballads.

00:00:49.401 --> 00:00:50.943 align:center
Ballads seems to be all good.

00:00:51.063 --> 00:00:52.425 align:center
Yes, very nice.

00:00:53.026 --> 00:00:54.408 align:center
Just getting the message that it's

00:00:54.528 --> 00:00:54.989 align:center
all good.

00:00:56.030 --> 00:00:58.634 align:center
Okay, playing ballads is quite of

00:00:58.714 --> 00:01:01.257 align:center
an interesting thing and it's something

00:01:01.277 --> 00:01:02.539 align:center
that took me a little while

00:01:02.619 --> 00:01:03.180 align:center
to get

00:01:03.880 --> 00:01:06.124 align:center
into the vibe, into the groove

00:01:06.184 --> 00:01:07.946 align:center
of playing ballads.

00:01:08.227 --> 00:01:09.409 align:center
I'm gonna see a few things

00:01:09.549 --> 00:01:12.133 align:center
which are generic when playing any

00:01:12.193 --> 00:01:13.435 align:center
kind of ballad, whether it's a

00:01:13.475 --> 00:01:15.959 align:center
Brazilian style or jazz or even

00:01:16.440 --> 00:01:18.123 align:center
a classical ballad, because so many

00:01:18.163 --> 00:01:18.884 align:center
beautiful ones.

00:01:19.545 --> 00:01:22.870 align:center
I believe the word ballad in

00:01:22.890 --> 00:01:24.813 align:center
French means balader, means to just

00:01:24.893 --> 00:01:27.658 align:center
walk leisurely, to take a gentle

00:01:27.718 --> 00:01:28.038 align:center
walk.

00:01:28.058 --> 00:01:29.180 align:center
You're not running anywhere.

00:01:29.700 --> 00:01:30.902 align:center
you're not in a hurry.

00:01:30.922 --> 00:01:32.224 align:center
So a ballad is something that

00:01:32.284 --> 00:01:33.786 align:center
usually reflects some kind of an

00:01:33.846 --> 00:01:35.328 align:center
emotional state as well.

00:01:36.029 --> 00:01:37.752 align:center
A lot of ballads, they're either,

00:01:37.772 --> 00:01:40.096 align:center
you know, romantic ballads or then

00:01:40.136 --> 00:01:41.317 align:center
there might be some kind of

00:01:41.337 --> 00:01:44.342 align:center
a nostalgic ballads or just an

00:01:44.442 --> 00:01:45.904 align:center
introspective ballad.

00:01:45.924 --> 00:01:47.106 align:center
Those are some of the moods

00:01:47.186 --> 00:01:48.428 align:center
that you get with the ballad.

00:01:48.929 --> 00:01:50.271 align:center
Number one thing that I'll say

00:01:50.311 --> 00:01:51.472 align:center
for anybody who wants to play

00:01:51.513 --> 00:01:53.215 align:center
in the ballads is that resist

00:01:53.516 --> 00:01:55.859 align:center
the temptation to feel ballads in

00:01:55.899 --> 00:01:56.540 align:center
double time.

00:01:56.630 --> 00:01:58.254 align:center
That's something that I had, and

00:01:58.314 --> 00:01:59.316 align:center
it took me a while to

00:01:59.376 --> 00:02:01.160 align:center
realize the importance of that.

00:02:01.841 --> 00:02:03.525 align:center
So for ballad, it usually means

00:02:03.565 --> 00:02:04.748 align:center
that it's not a fast tempo.

00:02:05.389 --> 00:02:06.772 align:center
So usually a good tempo, and

00:02:06.832 --> 00:02:07.914 align:center
both ballads we're going to play

00:02:07.934 --> 00:02:08.796 align:center
today, they have kind of a

00:02:08.836 --> 00:02:09.698 align:center
similar tempo.

00:02:09.718 --> 00:02:11.843 align:center
It's kind of like one, two,

00:02:11.863 --> 00:02:15.150 align:center
three, four, pop.

00:02:15.760 --> 00:02:17.823 align:center
So that's kind of like 60

00:02:17.903 --> 00:02:20.507 align:center
between 60 and 75 beats per

00:02:20.567 --> 00:02:21.969 align:center
minute is a good there's some

00:02:22.029 --> 00:02:24.052 align:center
slower balance and there's some slightly

00:02:24.112 --> 00:02:26.616 align:center
faster but resist the temptation to

00:02:26.656 --> 00:02:27.717 align:center
start to think of the ballad

00:02:27.778 --> 00:02:31.283 align:center
as being because then everything is

00:02:31.323 --> 00:02:33.306 align:center
going to be chopped and choppy

00:02:33.906 --> 00:02:35.108 align:center
and that's not a very good

00:02:35.168 --> 00:02:37.031 align:center
thing in terms of the expression

00:02:37.211 --> 00:02:39.635 align:center
the emotional and the technical expression

00:02:39.695 --> 00:02:41.357 align:center
of the ballad so those are

00:02:41.397 --> 00:02:42.880 align:center
some good things the other thing

00:02:42.980 --> 00:02:43.220 align:center
is

00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:46.322 align:center
Rarely, when you play a ballad,

00:02:46.763 --> 00:02:48.085 align:center
what you're gonna play with the

00:02:48.165 --> 00:02:49.927 align:center
melody is what's written on the

00:02:49.987 --> 00:02:50.308 align:center
page.

00:02:51.470 --> 00:02:53.452 align:center
A chart, a jazz chart especially,

00:02:53.953 --> 00:02:55.655 align:center
it's really meant to be a

00:02:55.776 --> 00:02:58.079 align:center
general guide to where the melodies

00:02:58.239 --> 00:02:58.379 align:center
are.

00:02:58.820 --> 00:03:00.282 align:center
But if you play them exactly

00:03:00.362 --> 00:03:02.425 align:center
as written, it's gonna sound mechanical,

00:03:02.545 --> 00:03:05.529 align:center
it's gonna lose the depth, the

00:03:05.629 --> 00:03:07.893 align:center
interpretation, the articulation, the

00:03:08.614 --> 00:03:09.635 align:center
phrasing, everything

00:03:09.695 --> 00:03:13.220 align:center
that is important to convey the

00:03:13.320 --> 00:03:16.285 align:center
your emotion as a performer and

00:03:16.365 --> 00:03:18.849 align:center
also the composer's emotion as a

00:03:19.009 --> 00:03:20.371 align:center
composer of the piece that you

00:03:20.432 --> 00:03:20.612 align:center
see.

00:03:20.992 --> 00:03:22.635 align:center
So sometimes we just write ballads

00:03:22.675 --> 00:03:23.416 align:center
straight forward.

00:03:23.737 --> 00:03:24.939 align:center
And I think it's pretty much

00:03:24.979 --> 00:03:25.460 align:center
the case.

00:03:25.620 --> 00:03:28.585 align:center
I believe that Hayden is going

00:03:28.605 --> 00:03:31.489 align:center
to make the pages available.

00:03:32.792 --> 00:03:33.433 align:center
Blah, blah, blah.

00:03:33.453 --> 00:03:35.556 align:center
Let me see.

00:03:35.676 --> 00:03:37.359 align:center
If you have any questions as

00:03:37.439 --> 00:03:38.020 align:center
we go.

00:03:38.330 --> 00:03:41.713 align:center
Let's move forward because you can

00:03:41.753 --> 00:03:43.255 align:center
just do questions on the chat

00:03:43.315 --> 00:03:44.476 align:center
and I'll be checking the chat

00:03:44.576 --> 00:03:45.838 align:center
regularly to see if there's any

00:03:45.878 --> 00:03:46.658 align:center
questions, okay?

00:03:48.020 --> 00:03:50.462 align:center
So I sent two ballads for

00:03:50.542 --> 00:03:52.685 align:center
us to explore today.

00:03:53.205 --> 00:03:55.167 align:center
Two by great composers which I

00:03:55.227 --> 00:03:57.810 align:center
personally find the greatest composers of

00:03:58.250 --> 00:04:00.833 align:center
this past hundred years, definitely.

00:04:00.933 --> 00:04:02.254 align:center
One of them is Wayne Shorter

00:04:02.514 --> 00:04:03.616 align:center
and we're gonna start with this

00:04:03.676 --> 00:04:08.040 align:center
composition from 1965 called Infant Eyes.

00:04:08.860 --> 00:04:10.622 align:center
beautiful because you know that we

00:04:10.662 --> 00:04:13.485 align:center
talk about all kinds of inspiration

00:04:13.525 --> 00:04:15.407 align:center
for ballads infant eyes I mean

00:04:15.427 --> 00:04:17.389 align:center
if you ever stared into the

00:04:17.510 --> 00:04:18.951 align:center
eyes of an infant a baby

00:04:19.712 --> 00:04:22.255 align:center
there's certain depth in there when

00:04:22.415 --> 00:04:23.796 align:center
somebody who's looking at the world

00:04:23.877 --> 00:04:26.119 align:center
for the first time and seeing

00:04:26.179 --> 00:04:28.101 align:center
things so that the discovery so

00:04:28.141 --> 00:04:30.083 align:center
there's a beautiful I think the

00:04:30.123 --> 00:04:33.507 align:center
Wayne Shorter music Wayne Shorter's music

00:04:33.627 --> 00:04:36.110 align:center
is really beautifully

00:04:37.030 --> 00:04:39.774 align:center
emotionally charged, technically impeccable,

00:04:40.295 --> 00:04:40.595 align:center
and it's

00:04:40.916 --> 00:04:43.800 align:center
always a great vehicle for improvisation.

00:04:43.860 --> 00:04:44.541 align:center
So we're going to look at

00:04:44.601 --> 00:04:45.022 align:center
all that.

00:04:46.043 --> 00:04:46.904 align:center
First I'm going to look at

00:04:46.965 --> 00:04:48.587 align:center
the chart called Infant Eyes and

00:04:48.627 --> 00:04:49.969 align:center
I believe that Hayden has a

00:04:50.149 --> 00:04:51.451 align:center
link to that where you can

00:04:51.511 --> 00:04:52.172 align:center
download it.

00:04:52.853 --> 00:04:56.679 align:center
And if not, we'll talk about

00:04:56.719 --> 00:04:58.501 align:center
it because this is a very

00:04:58.582 --> 00:05:00.304 align:center
short ballad that has the form

00:05:01.746 --> 00:05:02.828 align:center
ABA.

00:05:03.188 --> 00:05:04.370 align:center
It has an A section.

00:05:05.030 --> 00:05:06.753 align:center
Goes into a B and repeats

00:05:06.813 --> 00:05:07.554 align:center
to the A section.

00:05:07.654 --> 00:05:08.676 align:center
Very simple form.

00:05:09.558 --> 00:05:12.042 align:center
And it was a slow ballad

00:05:12.122 --> 00:05:13.284 align:center
in the chart that I sent.

00:05:13.745 --> 00:05:15.047 align:center
So you have to really be

00:05:15.247 --> 00:05:17.551 align:center
thinking of that pulse.

00:05:17.571 --> 00:05:20.016 align:center
Not so much as in stomping

00:05:20.056 --> 00:05:21.558 align:center
your feet kind of pulse, but

00:05:21.638 --> 00:05:23.482 align:center
just a general breathing.

00:05:24.163 --> 00:05:24.964 align:center
So why don't we go like

00:05:24.984 --> 00:05:25.185 align:center
this?

00:05:26.447 --> 00:05:27.388 align:center
One more thing I should say

00:05:27.428 --> 00:05:28.410 align:center
before I play it.

00:05:28.700 --> 00:05:31.604 align:center
Let's always, when practicing, when learning

00:05:31.664 --> 00:05:33.247 align:center
a new ballad, let's always try

00:05:33.327 --> 00:05:35.009 align:center
to take the point of view

00:05:35.209 --> 00:05:38.794 align:center
of the accompanist first and later

00:05:38.815 --> 00:05:40.196 align:center
you add the melody.

00:05:40.217 --> 00:05:41.599 align:center
I'm going to do that today

00:05:41.699 --> 00:05:43.341 align:center
so you can see the process,

00:05:43.401 --> 00:05:44.102 align:center
how it works.

00:05:44.743 --> 00:05:46.546 align:center
I think it's really good to

00:05:46.686 --> 00:05:50.952 align:center
just explore the possible voicings that

00:05:51.012 --> 00:05:53.295 align:center
you have and those voices can

00:05:53.335 --> 00:05:56.099 align:center
be represented either as blocks of

00:05:56.199 --> 00:05:56.600 align:center
chords

00:05:59.040 --> 00:06:00.862 align:center
Right, I'm playing G minor 7

00:06:00.882 --> 00:06:02.023 align:center
which is the first chord of

00:06:02.304 --> 00:06:08.051 align:center
infantiles and it goes to So

00:06:08.131 --> 00:06:09.172 align:center
now I'm gonna do with the

00:06:09.252 --> 00:06:10.874 align:center
pedal the pedal helps a lot

00:06:10.914 --> 00:06:12.015 align:center
in these cases you have to

00:06:12.055 --> 00:06:13.757 align:center
be very careful with the pedal

00:06:14.178 --> 00:06:16.681 align:center
to not over pedal and Especially

00:06:16.721 --> 00:06:18.242 align:center
to not sit your foot on

00:06:18.283 --> 00:06:19.624 align:center
the pedal and just let the

00:06:19.724 --> 00:06:22.588 align:center
chords leak into each other, especially

00:06:22.648 --> 00:06:24.670 align:center
when there's non-diatonic

00:06:24.830 --> 00:06:27.034 align:center
chord changes such as this beautiful

00:06:27.094 --> 00:06:28.156 align:center
ballad by Wayne Shorter.

00:06:28.556 --> 00:06:30.299 align:center
Anyway, I'm just gonna play the

00:06:30.480 --> 00:06:32.463 align:center
changes once and I want you

00:06:32.503 --> 00:06:34.406 align:center
to pay attention to the to

00:06:34.426 --> 00:06:36.269 align:center
the voices that I'm playing because

00:06:36.289 --> 00:06:37.912 align:center
those are very important.

00:06:38.453 --> 00:06:39.635 align:center
Not that you have to repeat

00:06:39.695 --> 00:06:41.098 align:center
the same voices but you see

00:06:41.438 --> 00:06:43.882 align:center
the possibilities of these voices.

00:06:44.483 --> 00:06:45.645 align:center
So we'll start with the G

00:06:45.685 --> 00:06:46.346 align:center
minor, right?

00:06:46.427 --> 00:06:47.629 align:center
So I'm gonna go and I'm

00:06:47.669 --> 00:06:48.510 align:center
just freely

00:06:48.750 --> 00:06:51.031 align:center
exploring the keyboard, not playing the

00:06:51.091 --> 00:06:51.891 align:center
melody, okay?

00:06:52.731 --> 00:07:06.015 align:center
One, two, three, four,

00:07:06.695 --> 00:08:45.145 align:center
and...

00:08:45.565 --> 00:08:45.985 align:center
Chords.

00:08:46.425 --> 00:08:47.905 align:center
You checked out the voices.

00:08:48.265 --> 00:08:49.966 align:center
I want to call your attention

00:08:49.986 --> 00:08:51.346 align:center
to one chord that's a really

00:08:51.386 --> 00:08:53.467 align:center
beautiful chord in the song, which

00:08:53.547 --> 00:08:55.288 align:center
is the A13b9.

00:08:56.648 --> 00:08:58.048 align:center
Quickly check if there's any questions

00:08:58.128 --> 00:08:58.509 align:center
there.

00:08:59.289 --> 00:09:01.569 align:center
Okay, yes, the score is here.

00:09:01.589 --> 00:09:03.010 align:center
Hayden, just put the link there.

00:09:03.170 --> 00:09:03.490 align:center
Awesome.

00:09:03.740 --> 00:09:05.122 align:center
So, I'm talking about the A

00:09:05.202 --> 00:09:08.606 align:center
13b9 is a theoretical way of

00:09:09.928 --> 00:09:10.889 align:center
notating this chord.

00:09:11.410 --> 00:09:12.231 align:center
But if you want to look

00:09:12.291 --> 00:09:13.552 align:center
at it from a much more

00:09:14.013 --> 00:09:17.217 align:center
simpler and more intuitive approach, how

00:09:17.277 --> 00:09:19.039 align:center
I voice this chord is that

00:09:19.099 --> 00:09:19.940 align:center
I put the A with the

00:09:19.960 --> 00:09:22.263 align:center
7th on the left hand, like

00:09:22.303 --> 00:09:23.865 align:center
that, and then I played an

00:09:24.005 --> 00:09:24.947 align:center
F sharp major.

00:09:28.171 --> 00:09:28.832 align:center
Look how beautiful.

00:09:28.892 --> 00:09:30.193 align:center
That's the same chord, right?

00:09:30.233 --> 00:09:32.716 align:center
It's got the, you know, 7,

00:09:33.257 --> 00:09:35.600 align:center
the 3rd, 13b9.

00:09:36.160 --> 00:09:38.162 align:center
And having played the F sharp

00:09:38.383 --> 00:09:41.947 align:center
major or G flat major, you

00:09:42.007 --> 00:09:43.408 align:center
notice that the next chord is

00:09:43.468 --> 00:09:44.950 align:center
actually a G flat major.

00:09:46.552 --> 00:09:49.215 align:center
It sounds totally different, but look

00:09:49.275 --> 00:09:50.016 align:center
at this when you play the

00:09:50.036 --> 00:09:53.460 align:center
first chord.

00:09:54.280 --> 00:09:59.747 align:center
And then you play

00:09:59.767 --> 00:10:00.347 align:center
a second.

00:10:00.447 --> 00:10:02.169 align:center
So you see the overlap between

00:10:02.229 --> 00:10:03.611 align:center
two chords which are not even

00:10:04.092 --> 00:10:05.393 align:center
in the same key.

00:10:06.815 --> 00:10:07.355 align:center
And how?

00:10:07.375 --> 00:10:08.496 align:center
Because you would think that an

00:10:08.517 --> 00:10:09.858 align:center
A 13th is going to resolve

00:10:09.898 --> 00:10:10.859 align:center
to a D major, but it

00:10:10.899 --> 00:10:11.620 align:center
went to that.

00:10:11.580 --> 00:10:13.543 align:center
F sharp major so it's a

00:10:13.623 --> 00:10:15.405 align:center
way to do that famous giant

00:10:15.445 --> 00:10:17.829 align:center
step so instead of resolving to

00:10:17.929 --> 00:10:19.431 align:center
one chord it resolves to one

00:10:19.571 --> 00:10:21.874 align:center
major third above so I love

00:10:21.914 --> 00:10:22.916 align:center
that kind of thing that's one

00:10:22.956 --> 00:10:23.917 align:center
of the reasons why I picked

00:10:23.957 --> 00:10:25.199 align:center
this tune because first of all

00:10:26.060 --> 00:10:28.644 align:center
there's the overlap of the voices

00:10:29.725 --> 00:10:30.546 align:center
so when you play a chord

00:10:30.587 --> 00:10:33.991 align:center
like this this enters into like

00:10:34.071 --> 00:10:35.033 align:center
that what we known as a

00:10:35.093 --> 00:10:36.915 align:center
diminished scale right if you have

00:10:36.955 --> 00:10:38.257 align:center
to play this on the key

00:10:38.297 --> 00:10:40.280 align:center
of A you could do like

00:10:46.610 --> 00:10:47.130 align:center
Right?

00:10:47.190 --> 00:10:48.231 align:center
This is the

00:10:51.614 --> 00:10:52.475 align:center
is the auxiliary

00:10:52.535 --> 00:10:54.276 align:center
diminished scale, but don't think of

00:10:54.336 --> 00:10:55.277 align:center
the scales in the case of

00:10:55.317 --> 00:10:55.777 align:center
the ballad.

00:10:55.817 --> 00:10:58.679 align:center
Think of the arpeggios.

00:10:58.980 --> 00:11:00.361 align:center
And the F sharp has also

00:11:00.441 --> 00:11:05.645 align:center
the flat five, the six,

00:11:06.705 --> 00:11:06.766 align:center
the

00:11:06.786 --> 00:11:12.910 align:center
seven.

00:11:14.391 --> 00:11:15.933 align:center
And because it's a diminished scale,

00:11:16.013 --> 00:11:18.755 align:center
you can expand by one and

00:11:18.795 --> 00:11:19.996 align:center
a half steps.

00:11:20.376 --> 00:11:22.718 align:center
So the A is already the

00:11:22.778 --> 00:11:24.079 align:center
root, so let's spend down.

00:11:24.459 --> 00:11:25.620 align:center
So from the F sharp.

00:11:26.860 --> 00:11:33.287 align:center
T sharp, C, and A.

00:11:35.028 --> 00:11:37.291 align:center
So see how many possibilities are

00:11:37.351 --> 00:11:38.292 align:center
in this one chord.

00:11:38.832 --> 00:11:39.453 align:center
Really beautiful.

00:11:39.773 --> 00:11:40.654 align:center
The other chord that I want

00:11:40.674 --> 00:11:41.875 align:center
to point out as being a

00:11:41.995 --> 00:11:44.078 align:center
really good chord that deserves some

00:11:44.138 --> 00:11:46.400 align:center
attention when you're practicing it is

00:11:46.500 --> 00:11:48.022 align:center
on the B section because it

00:11:48.062 --> 00:11:50.184 align:center
starts on E flat major 7.

00:11:51.565 --> 00:11:52.987 align:center
Then you have this kind of

00:11:53.027 --> 00:11:59.233 align:center
fridge.

00:11:59.253 --> 00:12:02.416 align:center
It goes back and then everything

00:12:02.476 --> 00:12:02.877 align:center
moves.

00:12:05.139 --> 00:12:06.040 align:center
I'll repeat that.

00:12:06.060 --> 00:12:07.041 align:center
E flat major.

00:12:08.261 --> 00:12:12.024 align:center
Oops,

00:12:12.044 --> 00:12:13.225 align:center
sorry, not changed the bass.

00:12:22.171 --> 00:12:22.991 align:center
Why do you play in that

00:12:23.071 --> 00:12:23.692 align:center
chord?

00:12:23.712 --> 00:12:24.712 align:center
When you're going to improvise and

00:12:24.772 --> 00:12:26.433 align:center
everything for the voices, you think

00:12:26.494 --> 00:12:27.794 align:center
it's an E major seventh chord.

00:12:27.914 --> 00:12:29.235 align:center
It's like the...

00:12:30.656 --> 00:12:31.737 align:center
Which is the next chord is

00:12:31.777 --> 00:12:32.798 align:center
going to be anyway, but this

00:12:32.918 --> 00:12:34.439 align:center
one keeps the E flat on

00:12:34.479 --> 00:12:34.879 align:center
the bass.

00:12:41.984 --> 00:12:44.986 align:center
Beautiful voice.

00:12:45.006 --> 00:12:47.567 align:center
That's nice also.

00:12:47.587 --> 00:12:49.068 align:center
So when they say E flat,

00:12:49.249 --> 00:12:50.870 align:center
E major seven with a D

00:12:50.910 --> 00:12:51.470 align:center
sharp bass.

00:12:54.300 --> 00:12:56.542 align:center
The interesting analysis of that chord

00:12:56.582 --> 00:12:57.524 align:center
is that you can think of

00:12:57.624 --> 00:12:58.925 align:center
it from the bottom up or

00:12:58.945 --> 00:13:00.427 align:center
from the top down.

00:13:00.447 --> 00:13:01.928 align:center
From the bottom up, as an

00:13:02.008 --> 00:13:05.753 align:center
E flat chord, it's the chords

00:13:05.853 --> 00:13:08.676 align:center
that usually associate with flamenco music.

00:13:08.736 --> 00:13:15.183 align:center
If

00:13:15.223 --> 00:13:16.144 align:center
you think from the bottom

00:13:16.204 --> 00:13:17.565 align:center
down, it's an E major seventh

00:13:17.626 --> 00:13:20.549 align:center
chord with a major seventh on

00:13:20.569 --> 00:13:23.512 align:center
the bass.

00:13:23.532 --> 00:13:26.215 align:center
That change of perspective gives you

00:13:26.315 --> 00:13:28.598 align:center
multiple possibilities when improvising when

00:13:28.678 --> 00:13:29.118 align:center
voicing.

00:13:29.138 --> 00:13:30.380 align:center
So it's something to keep in

00:13:30.460 --> 00:13:30.840 align:center
mind.

00:13:31.010 --> 00:13:31.571 align:center
Okay?

00:13:32.332 --> 00:13:34.074 align:center
Now, let me quickly check if

00:13:34.094 --> 00:13:35.236 align:center
there's any questions here.

00:13:36.177 --> 00:13:37.179 align:center
No, not yet.

00:13:37.339 --> 00:13:37.860 align:center
Feel free.

00:13:37.900 --> 00:13:38.581 align:center
Don't be shy.

00:13:38.761 --> 00:13:40.564 align:center
If you are watching this live,

00:13:40.644 --> 00:13:42.927 align:center
feel free to just pop in

00:13:42.947 --> 00:13:44.069 align:center
a question in the chat and

00:13:44.089 --> 00:13:45.210 align:center
I'll be happy to answer.

00:13:46.452 --> 00:13:48.275 align:center
Now, I'm going to actually... That's

00:13:48.375 --> 00:13:51.419 align:center
one of the characteristics of well-written

00:13:51.480 --> 00:13:53.322 align:center
music, in my opinion, is that

00:13:53.422 --> 00:13:55.385 align:center
you can actually play the melody

00:13:55.666 --> 00:13:56.487 align:center
from the voicings.

00:13:57.068 --> 00:13:58.770 align:center
So the voicings will...

00:13:58.780 --> 00:14:00.683 align:center
lead to the melody and the

00:14:00.743 --> 00:14:02.105 align:center
melody will lead to the voices.

00:14:03.026 --> 00:14:04.288 align:center
In other words, there's not that

00:14:04.328 --> 00:14:06.050 align:center
there's like the changes, the harmony

00:14:06.411 --> 00:14:07.593 align:center
and a melody that floats on

00:14:07.673 --> 00:14:07.933 align:center
top.

00:14:08.454 --> 00:14:10.276 align:center
It's more of a vertical approach

00:14:10.296 --> 00:14:11.518 align:center
in which the melody and the

00:14:11.578 --> 00:14:13.621 align:center
chords are so connected but not

00:14:13.821 --> 00:14:14.342 align:center
rigidly.

00:14:14.863 --> 00:14:15.784 align:center
They're flexible.

00:14:16.245 --> 00:14:17.927 align:center
So that way it allows you

00:14:18.027 --> 00:14:20.311 align:center
to interpret and you can really

00:14:20.391 --> 00:14:23.155 align:center
see what a great composer Wayne

00:14:23.215 --> 00:14:25.037 align:center
Shorter is because as a saxophone

00:14:25.097 --> 00:14:26.900 align:center
player he has such a deep...

00:14:27.800 --> 00:14:30.681 align:center
grasp of the harmonic verticality of

00:14:30.761 --> 00:14:32.521 align:center
those notes that he plays, and

00:14:32.601 --> 00:14:35.342 align:center
that's what makes it really incredible.

00:14:35.362 --> 00:14:36.262 align:center
So check this out.

00:14:36.562 --> 00:14:38.162 align:center
I'm gonna play now with the

00:14:38.222 --> 00:14:38.582 align:center
melody.

00:14:39.122 --> 00:14:44.984 align:center
So one, two, sorry,

00:14:48.845 --> 00:14:56.726 align:center
one,

00:14:57.406 --> 00:15:03.008 align:center
two,

00:16:17.404 --> 00:16:22.665 align:center
nice.

00:16:28.726 --> 00:16:31.567 align:center
Beautiful use of resolution on a

00:16:31.647 --> 00:16:34.407 align:center
suspended chord, which leaves everything open.

00:16:34.427 --> 00:16:35.427 align:center
So when it goes like the

00:16:35.467 --> 00:16:45.710 align:center
last three bars, instead

00:16:45.750 --> 00:16:47.150 align:center
of doing

00:16:47.230 --> 00:16:47.510 align:center
minor,

00:16:51.370 --> 00:16:54.331 align:center
which goes back to...

00:16:58.972 --> 00:17:01.053 align:center
I'm starting to express a little

00:17:01.093 --> 00:17:03.554 align:center
more difference of interpretation on the

00:17:03.614 --> 00:17:22.659 align:center
melody.

00:18:38.781 --> 00:18:39.822 align:center
Think of it as an F

00:18:39.942 --> 00:18:42.142 align:center
minor.

00:18:43.623 --> 00:18:43.783 align:center
The

00:18:47.384 --> 00:18:48.304 align:center
other way to think about

00:18:48.324 --> 00:18:53.266 align:center
it is an A flat major

00:18:53.286 --> 00:18:58.267 align:center
with a B flat bass.

00:18:58.667 --> 00:19:00.088 align:center
So it's a good idea as

00:19:00.128 --> 00:19:02.288 align:center
you practice this tune to explore

00:19:02.508 --> 00:19:03.889 align:center
all the suspended chords.

00:19:03.949 --> 00:19:05.089 align:center
The other one is E flat

00:19:05.129 --> 00:19:06.530 align:center
suspended.

00:19:06.630 --> 00:19:07.410 align:center
Same thing, it's like a B

00:19:07.430 --> 00:19:08.010 align:center
flat minor.

00:19:11.910 --> 00:19:13.452 align:center
The other one is the Fsus.

00:19:13.792 --> 00:19:19.359 align:center
It's like a C minor

00:19:19.379 --> 00:19:19.459 align:center
with

00:19:19.499 --> 00:19:21.882 align:center
the F bass.

00:19:22.603 --> 00:19:22.864 align:center
Sorry.

00:19:26.809 --> 00:19:31.314 align:center
Major 3rd goes into the 6th.

00:19:31.334 --> 00:19:32.736 align:center
So all these chords can be

00:19:32.816 --> 00:19:34.718 align:center
explored in such a beautiful way

00:19:34.879 --> 00:19:37.722 align:center
because they are full of possibilities.

00:19:38.443 --> 00:19:40.586 align:center
So one of the characteristics of

00:19:40.626 --> 00:19:42.348 align:center
Wayne Shorter's music is that his

00:19:42.448 --> 00:19:43.950 align:center
music is never closed.

00:19:44.150 --> 00:19:45.812 align:center
There's not like one way of

00:19:45.912 --> 00:19:46.293 align:center
playing it.

00:19:46.694 --> 00:19:47.895 align:center
When you hit these chords, you

00:19:47.935 --> 00:19:49.377 align:center
can think of them as a

00:19:49.397 --> 00:19:51.741 align:center
multitude of other possible chords that

00:19:52.101 --> 00:19:55.446 align:center
coexist as an atmosphere of possible

00:19:55.526 --> 00:19:56.267 align:center
chords around.

00:19:56.307 --> 00:19:56.988 align:center
So let me see.

00:19:57.709 --> 00:20:01.574 align:center
Bb7sus or Bb9sus.

00:20:01.594 --> 00:20:02.856 align:center
Yeah, you can also be reading

00:20:02.996 --> 00:20:03.457 align:center
F minor.

00:20:04.078 --> 00:20:06.702 align:center
You can also be reading Eb.

00:20:07.463 --> 00:20:09.285 align:center
So let me explain.

00:20:09.746 --> 00:20:10.887 align:center
Bb bass.

00:20:11.989 --> 00:20:12.730 align:center
Sus4.

00:20:12.870 --> 00:20:14.051 align:center
Basically, if you want a voiced

00:20:14.271 --> 00:20:16.834 align:center
chord, or sus9, you express it

00:20:16.934 --> 00:20:17.014 align:center
as

00:20:19.937 --> 00:20:21.478 align:center
F minor 6, F minor

00:20:21.498 --> 00:20:24.581 align:center
7,

00:20:24.601 --> 00:20:28.084 align:center
A flat major 7.

00:20:28.104 --> 00:20:32.308 align:center
Also, E flat as a triad.

00:20:32.328 --> 00:20:41.357 align:center
And then you can do...

00:20:45.601 --> 00:20:50.785 align:center
So by playing this...

00:20:50.805 --> 00:20:51.926 align:center
So I never think of B

00:20:51.966 --> 00:20:53.248 align:center
flat as a starting point.

00:20:53.688 --> 00:20:55.770 align:center
B flat is the anchoring note.

00:20:56.140 --> 00:20:57.361 align:center
Because when you open up the

00:20:57.401 --> 00:20:59.984 align:center
arpeggios and improvisations and the voicings,

00:21:00.425 --> 00:21:01.446 align:center
it's always going to start on

00:21:01.506 --> 00:21:02.187 align:center
a different note.

00:21:02.667 --> 00:21:03.648 align:center
That's why it's so beautiful.

00:21:03.969 --> 00:21:07.152 align:center
When the melody hits, it locks

00:21:07.172 --> 00:21:08.373 align:center
in with the bass, like the

00:21:08.433 --> 00:21:12.318 align:center
melody goes... What you do, you

00:21:12.338 --> 00:21:19.005 align:center
go... Or even the... Or if

00:21:19.045 --> 00:21:21.888 align:center
you go higher...

00:21:26.433 --> 00:21:26.954 align:center
Hey, I hope

00:21:26.994 --> 00:21:28.635 align:center
that gives you some ideas on

00:21:28.655 --> 00:21:29.316 align:center
how to play.

00:21:30.137 --> 00:21:32.059 align:center
I'll quickly check for any questions

00:21:32.119 --> 00:21:32.319 align:center
here.

00:21:32.620 --> 00:21:32.920 align:center
Nope.

00:21:33.160 --> 00:21:36.425 align:center
Not yet, but keep it active.

00:21:37.226 --> 00:21:38.768 align:center
I'm going to now use these

00:21:38.848 --> 00:21:40.710 align:center
changes as a basis for some

00:21:40.731 --> 00:21:42.914 align:center
improvisation, okay?

00:21:42.934 --> 00:21:44.255 align:center
So I'm looking at the changes

00:21:44.796 --> 00:21:46.839 align:center
of infant eyes and I'm just

00:21:46.879 --> 00:21:47.580 align:center
going to improvise.

00:21:49.923 --> 00:21:51.345 align:center
That's what I said in the

00:21:51.405 --> 00:21:51.766 align:center
beginning.

00:21:51.786 --> 00:21:53.128 align:center
It's really important to keep in

00:21:53.208 --> 00:21:54.610 align:center
mind to not think that this

00:21:54.630 --> 00:21:55.431 align:center
is going to be just a

00:21:56.312 --> 00:21:58.195 align:center
vehicle for scales to be played

00:21:58.275 --> 00:21:58.776 align:center
up and down.

00:21:59.336 --> 00:22:01.079 align:center
That's when it's really important for

00:22:01.359 --> 00:22:02.000 align:center
every player.

00:22:02.160 --> 00:22:03.862 align:center
regardless of the instrument but we're

00:22:03.882 --> 00:22:06.004 align:center
talking about pianos here especially pianos

00:22:06.104 --> 00:22:08.487 align:center
is really important for all of

00:22:08.547 --> 00:22:12.432 align:center
you to stay focused on the

00:22:12.672 --> 00:22:15.715 align:center
expression and that the notes you

00:22:15.815 --> 00:22:18.198 align:center
don't play have as much value

00:22:18.258 --> 00:22:19.480 align:center
as the notes that you play

00:22:19.580 --> 00:22:21.842 align:center
in other words use of space

00:22:22.723 --> 00:22:24.505 align:center
to create something you can do

00:22:24.525 --> 00:22:25.967 align:center
a little flourish that has a

00:22:26.007 --> 00:22:27.489 align:center
little run or something like this

00:22:27.589 --> 00:22:29.070 align:center
but mostly what we're trying to

00:22:29.130 --> 00:22:30.652 align:center
do look at this melody the

00:22:30.712 --> 00:22:31.813 align:center
melody is so simple

00:22:37.580 --> 00:22:37.680 align:center
right

00:22:44.760 --> 00:22:45.920 align:center
It's like a story.

00:22:46.621 --> 00:22:48.201 align:center
So when you improvise over that,

00:22:48.241 --> 00:22:49.921 align:center
you have to keep telling that

00:22:50.021 --> 00:22:51.282 align:center
story in your own way.

00:22:51.462 --> 00:22:53.102 align:center
So let's try once, okay?

00:22:53.482 --> 00:22:54.843 align:center
I'm gonna improvise my own way,

00:22:55.303 --> 00:22:56.603 align:center
but it's really important for you

00:22:56.683 --> 00:22:59.424 align:center
to also find your own way

00:22:59.504 --> 00:23:01.104 align:center
of telling that story, okay?

00:23:01.265 --> 00:23:01.805 align:center
Let's check it out.

00:23:02.685 --> 00:23:37.274 align:center
One, two, three, four.

00:24:29.929 --> 00:24:30.849 align:center
What's the story there?

00:24:31.109 --> 00:24:31.949 align:center
I told the story.

00:24:31.969 --> 00:24:32.869 align:center
If you ask me to tell

00:24:32.970 --> 00:24:34.030 align:center
it again, it's gonna be a

00:24:34.090 --> 00:24:34.730 align:center
different story.

00:24:34.960 --> 00:24:37.343 align:center
That's one of the beautiful things

00:24:37.403 --> 00:24:40.007 align:center
to do with the possibilities that

00:24:40.047 --> 00:24:42.390 align:center
a well-written piece of music gives

00:24:42.410 --> 00:24:43.391 align:center
you for improvisation.

00:24:44.713 --> 00:24:46.636 align:center
So instead of thinking in technical

00:24:46.736 --> 00:24:47.797 align:center
terms, I mean there is a

00:24:47.878 --> 00:24:49.780 align:center
technique to that too, but it's

00:24:49.840 --> 00:24:51.643 align:center
not a technique that involves scales

00:24:52.123 --> 00:24:55.668 align:center
and fingerings and chords pressed out

00:24:55.788 --> 00:24:58.372 align:center
as stacks of notes.

00:24:58.973 --> 00:25:01.556 align:center
It's more about creating this atmosphere

00:25:02.037 --> 00:25:03.979 align:center
on which you can tell a

00:25:04.040 --> 00:25:04.400 align:center
story.

00:25:04.930 --> 00:25:06.131 align:center
And that story can be a

00:25:06.211 --> 00:25:07.513 align:center
sad story, a happy story, a

00:25:07.593 --> 00:25:10.736 align:center
romantic story, a nostalgic story, whatever

00:25:10.776 --> 00:25:11.116 align:center
you want.

00:25:11.136 --> 00:25:13.619 align:center
It's going to be very interesting

00:25:13.679 --> 00:25:16.742 align:center
to see how that operates, right?

00:25:17.423 --> 00:25:20.506 align:center
I'll do one more chorus so

00:25:20.526 --> 00:25:22.148 align:center
you see how many different ideas

00:25:22.188 --> 00:25:23.229 align:center
you can get out of that.

00:25:23.329 --> 00:25:24.530 align:center
And hopefully, and this is all

00:25:24.570 --> 00:25:26.092 align:center
being recorded also in media, so

00:25:26.132 --> 00:25:27.013 align:center
if you want to follow what

00:25:27.033 --> 00:25:28.495 align:center
I've played, you just have to

00:25:28.535 --> 00:25:29.436 align:center
check out afterwards.

00:25:29.456 --> 00:25:30.697 align:center
Hey, they will post the light

00:25:30.757 --> 00:25:32.299 align:center
up notes, you know, and then

00:25:32.339 --> 00:25:33.700 align:center
you can see what I'm playing.

00:25:34.360 --> 00:25:36.160 align:center
One more round through the chorus

00:25:36.220 --> 00:25:36.900 align:center
and then we're going to look

00:25:36.961 --> 00:25:38.041 align:center
at a different composition.

00:25:38.661 --> 00:25:39.421 align:center
Alright, so here it goes.

00:25:40.641 --> 00:25:42.602 align:center
One, two, and I'll play one

00:25:42.642 --> 00:25:43.982 align:center
chorus then I'll play the melody

00:25:44.002 --> 00:25:47.062 align:center
as I head out, okay?

00:25:47.463 --> 00:25:49.563 align:center
Here it goes.

00:26:01.485 --> 00:26:08.287 align:center
One,

00:28:00.369 --> 00:28:10.111 align:center
two,

00:28:27.374 --> 00:28:29.954 align:center
three.

00:28:32.415 --> 00:28:32.435 align:center
I

00:28:48.738 --> 00:28:49.458 align:center
hope you like that.

00:28:50.358 --> 00:28:52.839 align:center
It was a really, it's a

00:28:52.859 --> 00:28:54.359 align:center
song that moves me a lot.

00:28:54.439 --> 00:28:54.999 align:center
I loved it.

00:28:55.059 --> 00:28:56.100 align:center
I made a couple mistakes on

00:28:56.140 --> 00:28:56.900 align:center
the melody there.

00:28:56.920 --> 00:28:58.100 align:center
Hope you forgive me that.

00:28:58.520 --> 00:28:59.963 align:center
because I was just getting carried

00:29:00.063 --> 00:29:00.344 align:center
away.

00:29:00.544 --> 00:29:03.389 align:center
But thank you, Steve Schuler, for

00:29:03.429 --> 00:29:04.411 align:center
the comments there.

00:29:05.133 --> 00:29:06.896 align:center
But let's move forward.

00:29:06.916 --> 00:29:08.639 align:center
Now, the next one I'm going

00:29:08.680 --> 00:29:09.922 align:center
to work is a composition by

00:29:09.982 --> 00:29:10.864 align:center
Ameto Pascual.

00:29:10.884 --> 00:29:12.467 align:center
It's called Campinas.

00:29:13.328 --> 00:29:14.471 align:center
Campinas is the name of a

00:29:14.651 --> 00:29:16.074 align:center
town in the state of São

00:29:16.094 --> 00:29:18.017 align:center
Paulo, Brazil, and Ameto wrote that

00:29:18.058 --> 00:29:19.380 align:center
composition in the bus.

00:29:19.720 --> 00:29:21.923 align:center
as he was approaching the city

00:29:22.003 --> 00:29:23.465 align:center
of Campinas to play a gig

00:29:23.505 --> 00:29:26.950 align:center
there, he saw, Campinas means medals,

00:29:27.190 --> 00:29:29.954 align:center
like nice rolling medals, which probably

00:29:30.014 --> 00:29:31.216 align:center
the city at one point had.

00:29:31.276 --> 00:29:32.457 align:center
Now it's a big city, Sao

00:29:32.477 --> 00:29:32.758 align:center
Paulo.

00:29:33.499 --> 00:29:35.662 align:center
But in 1976 when Hermeto wrote

00:29:35.682 --> 00:29:37.404 align:center
this piece, he was just coming,

00:29:37.444 --> 00:29:38.565 align:center
actually I think it was even

00:29:38.585 --> 00:29:38.986 align:center
77.

00:29:39.607 --> 00:29:40.708 align:center
That was the very first tune

00:29:40.748 --> 00:29:42.250 align:center
that Hermeto Pasqual showed me when

00:29:42.331 --> 00:29:42.791 align:center
I met him.

00:29:43.853 --> 00:29:46.096 align:center
And it's just a gorgeous ballad.

00:29:46.496 --> 00:29:49.340 align:center
And he has this ability to

00:29:50.670 --> 00:29:53.353 align:center
Keep going like it.

00:29:53.373 --> 00:29:54.754 align:center
I think it goes through every

00:29:54.854 --> 00:29:58.057 align:center
key Every possible key.

00:29:58.278 --> 00:29:59.359 align:center
I'm not sure I never did

00:29:59.399 --> 00:30:01.201 align:center
the kind of statistical analysis of

00:30:01.321 --> 00:30:03.022 align:center
it, but it's the what that

00:30:03.123 --> 00:30:05.985 align:center
does the harmonic shifting of this

00:30:06.005 --> 00:30:09.949 align:center
piece is that It gives colors

00:30:10.410 --> 00:30:12.072 align:center
it so it's a very colorful

00:30:12.152 --> 00:30:15.575 align:center
piece and again the importance of

00:30:15.635 --> 00:30:17.297 align:center
what I said before just to

00:30:17.377 --> 00:30:20.440 align:center
remind everybody don't

00:30:20.360 --> 00:30:23.844 align:center
succumb to the temptation of thinking

00:30:24.024 --> 00:30:26.546 align:center
everything instead of one, two, like

00:30:26.566 --> 00:30:29.449 align:center
one, two, three, four.

00:30:29.550 --> 00:30:30.831 align:center
If you start chopping it up

00:30:30.891 --> 00:30:32.713 align:center
too much, you're going to lose

00:30:32.773 --> 00:30:35.075 align:center
the ability to express.

00:30:35.376 --> 00:30:37.558 align:center
It's going to become just a

00:30:37.638 --> 00:30:39.700 align:center
finger exercise, which this is not.

00:30:40.621 --> 00:30:44.585 align:center
The important technical aspects here is

00:30:44.645 --> 00:30:46.567 align:center
to divide, because if you just

00:30:46.647 --> 00:30:47.769 align:center
think of the pulse of a

00:30:47.849 --> 00:30:49.210 align:center
ballad as being one,

00:30:54.550 --> 00:30:56.854 align:center
Very soon there's a tendency for

00:30:56.894 --> 00:30:58.176 align:center
that to become in a way

00:30:58.196 --> 00:31:02.923 align:center
inducing trance, but also inducing you

00:31:02.943 --> 00:31:04.606 align:center
falling asleep on just the same.

00:31:04.967 --> 00:31:05.988 align:center
So one thing that I do

00:31:06.028 --> 00:31:08.052 align:center
that helps is to keep a

00:31:08.092 --> 00:31:08.753 align:center
little kick.

00:31:09.354 --> 00:31:11.617 align:center
And this song, Campinas, has that

00:31:11.698 --> 00:31:14.101 align:center
kick embedded in the music.

00:31:14.161 --> 00:31:15.363 align:center
I want to call your attention

00:31:15.424 --> 00:31:15.784 align:center
to that.

00:31:16.165 --> 00:31:19.490 align:center
So instead of being one, two,

00:31:19.530 --> 00:31:25.515 align:center
three, four, it's like one.

00:31:28.438 --> 00:31:28.598 align:center
So

00:31:38.787 --> 00:31:41.130 align:center
that kind of thing keeps,

00:31:41.150 --> 00:31:42.451 align:center
it lifts up the music and

00:31:42.471 --> 00:31:43.191 align:center
drops it again.

00:31:49.597 --> 00:31:51.459 align:center
So it's a very slow, what

00:31:51.519 --> 00:31:52.720 align:center
we call a 3-3-2.

00:31:53.010 --> 00:31:55.292 align:center
one two three one two three

00:31:55.552 --> 00:31:57.654 align:center
one two one instead of one

00:31:58.014 --> 00:32:00.416 align:center
so i'm not doing a double

00:32:00.536 --> 00:32:02.698 align:center
time feel i'm just inserting a

00:32:02.738 --> 00:32:04.259 align:center
little lift in the middle and

00:32:04.319 --> 00:32:05.180 align:center
by the way i use that

00:32:05.260 --> 00:32:06.401 align:center
in infantize as well

00:32:17.170 --> 00:32:17.470 align:center
so it's

00:32:17.630 --> 00:32:19.872 align:center
it's there uh quickly check for

00:32:19.912 --> 00:32:21.853 align:center
any uh thank you for the

00:32:21.893 --> 00:32:25.256 align:center
improvisation uh comments there hayden it's

00:32:25.396 --> 00:32:26.837 align:center
uh as i said it's very

00:32:26.857 --> 00:32:28.459 align:center
inspiring to play good pieces of

00:32:28.539 --> 00:32:30.180 align:center
music some ballads are kind of

00:32:30.120 --> 00:32:30.821 align:center
Boring.

00:32:31.101 --> 00:32:33.223 align:center
I prefer to not play them.

00:32:33.243 --> 00:32:34.164 align:center
But when I have the choice

00:32:34.204 --> 00:32:35.926 align:center
to pick the tunes, those are

00:32:36.026 --> 00:32:37.007 align:center
always at the top of my

00:32:37.067 --> 00:32:37.848 align:center
list.

00:32:37.868 --> 00:32:39.370 align:center
Campinas by Rimeto Pasqual.

00:32:39.390 --> 00:32:40.371 align:center
Let's take a look at that

00:32:40.471 --> 00:32:40.851 align:center
next.

00:32:40.871 --> 00:32:43.794 align:center
Just like I did with Infantias,

00:32:43.814 --> 00:32:46.677 align:center
I'm just going to play the

00:32:46.757 --> 00:32:48.659 align:center
chords with no melody.

00:32:48.679 --> 00:32:48.900 align:center
Right?

00:32:49.760 --> 00:32:51.522 align:center
So one, two...

00:32:52.644 --> 00:32:54.225 align:center
There's a pickup which is on

00:32:54.245 --> 00:32:56.668 align:center
C7sus, also that chord.

00:32:58.570 --> 00:32:58.890 align:center
Three.

00:33:14.700 --> 00:33:15.260 align:center
Kick.

00:33:27.281 --> 00:33:27.741 align:center
Change.

00:33:31.702 --> 00:34:41.789 align:center
It's

00:34:43.869 --> 00:34:44.989 align:center
a

00:34:49.590 --> 00:34:59.151 align:center
long

00:35:23.573 --> 00:35:32.734 align:center
melody.

00:35:52.496 --> 00:35:57.097 align:center
It's a

00:37:43.108 --> 00:37:47.148 align:center
lot longer than infantiles,

00:37:47.168 --> 00:37:49.088 align:center
but the way that it goes,

00:37:49.108 --> 00:37:50.628 align:center
and I broke down the chart

00:37:50.748 --> 00:37:53.309 align:center
into three parts, actually four parts,

00:37:53.829 --> 00:37:55.369 align:center
so you can see just basically

00:37:55.409 --> 00:37:57.169 align:center
to understand the music by chunks,

00:37:57.189 --> 00:37:58.749 align:center
and I really recommend if you're

00:37:58.769 --> 00:38:00.429 align:center
going to practice this, practice this

00:38:00.489 --> 00:38:02.070 align:center
chunk separately.

00:38:02.090 --> 00:38:04.710 align:center
Practice the possibilities of voicings in

00:38:04.730 --> 00:38:06.130 align:center
the accompaniment first.

00:38:06.360 --> 00:38:07.782 align:center
and then you're gonna see how

00:38:07.842 --> 00:38:10.025 align:center
the melody fits over that super

00:38:10.045 --> 00:38:11.026 align:center
nicely.

00:38:11.047 --> 00:38:14.511 align:center
Quickly checking for some questions, no,

00:38:14.652 --> 00:38:16.594 align:center
no comments there, so let's continue.

00:38:17.556 --> 00:38:18.617 align:center
So what I'm gonna do right

00:38:18.677 --> 00:38:22.142 align:center
now, I play the chords, I

00:38:22.182 --> 00:38:23.584 align:center
play the melody, so now I'm

00:38:23.624 --> 00:38:26.248 align:center
gonna improvise over that.

00:38:26.628 --> 00:38:27.990 align:center
When I was playing with Armando

00:38:28.010 --> 00:38:30.754 align:center
Pasquale's band, we would spend five

00:38:30.814 --> 00:38:32.396 align:center
days a week, at least six

00:38:32.456 --> 00:38:35.100 align:center
hours a day rehearsing intense music.

00:38:35.150 --> 00:38:36.672 align:center
Lots of stuff they have to

00:38:36.772 --> 00:38:38.995 align:center
practice, memorize, and this was just

00:38:39.056 --> 00:38:42.480 align:center
like something that would be at

00:38:42.500 --> 00:38:44.003 align:center
the end of like six hours,

00:38:44.103 --> 00:38:45.645 align:center
our minds were like, our hands

00:38:45.665 --> 00:38:47.387 align:center
were like full of all this

00:38:47.468 --> 00:38:48.950 align:center
music.

00:38:48.970 --> 00:38:51.333 align:center
So we use Campinas, this theme

00:38:51.533 --> 00:38:53.256 align:center
that I'm showing to you, as

00:38:53.316 --> 00:38:55.880 align:center
something to relax and also to

00:38:55.980 --> 00:38:57.422 align:center
practice improvisation.

00:38:57.963 --> 00:38:59.164 align:center
So we will play the tune

00:38:59.244 --> 00:39:00.586 align:center
and everybody will play at least

00:39:00.666 --> 00:39:01.808 align:center
one chorus, maybe two.

00:39:02.369 --> 00:39:03.210 align:center
It's a long...

00:39:03.320 --> 00:39:05.944 align:center
It's a long form, so two

00:39:05.984 --> 00:39:07.546 align:center
choruses might be too long.

00:39:08.227 --> 00:39:09.408 align:center
But maybe you can do two

00:39:09.468 --> 00:39:09.749 align:center
choruses.

00:39:09.849 --> 00:39:11.671 align:center
I've done it too.

00:39:11.751 --> 00:39:13.954 align:center
So if you practice, you can

00:39:13.995 --> 00:39:15.056 align:center
do 20 choruses.

00:39:15.176 --> 00:39:17.159 align:center
It's totally fine to see where

00:39:17.199 --> 00:39:18.421 align:center
this music takes you.

00:39:19.081 --> 00:39:20.724 align:center
Instead of trying to think of

00:39:20.804 --> 00:39:21.665 align:center
what am I going to do

00:39:21.745 --> 00:39:23.347 align:center
on this music, see where is

00:39:23.387 --> 00:39:24.849 align:center
this music taking me to?

00:39:25.630 --> 00:39:27.233 align:center
And let the music take you,

00:39:27.253 --> 00:39:28.955 align:center
because that's the beauty of some

00:39:28.995 --> 00:39:30.197 align:center
of the harmonic changes.

00:39:30.717 --> 00:39:31.959 align:center
Like when it goes, of course,

00:39:32.019 --> 00:39:32.720 align:center
the giant step.

00:39:33.650 --> 00:39:36.574 align:center
from D major to F sharp

00:39:36.594 --> 00:39:39.218 align:center
major and there's a few of

00:39:39.278 --> 00:39:41.642 align:center
those are from C major to

00:39:41.662 --> 00:39:44.226 align:center
F sharp major and then go

00:39:44.246 --> 00:39:48.372 align:center
chromatically and then to B which

00:39:48.392 --> 00:39:48.652 align:center
is like this.

00:39:48.672 --> 00:39:50.155 align:center
So this kind of changes they're

00:39:50.375 --> 00:39:53.760 align:center
so inspiring

00:39:54.361 --> 00:39:55.423 align:center
because if you're trying

00:39:55.443 --> 00:39:56.845 align:center
to think in terms of scales

00:39:56.905 --> 00:39:59.889 align:center
and linear structures that music will

00:40:00.049 --> 00:40:00.410 align:center
trip.

00:40:00.590 --> 00:40:01.030 align:center
you.

00:40:01.731 --> 00:40:02.712 align:center
The scales are not going to

00:40:02.752 --> 00:40:02.932 align:center
fit.

00:40:03.012 --> 00:40:04.053 align:center
I mean they fit over one

00:40:04.073 --> 00:40:05.355 align:center
chord but when the chord changes

00:40:05.375 --> 00:40:06.316 align:center
you're going to have to play

00:40:06.356 --> 00:40:07.577 align:center
in a broken way.

00:40:07.977 --> 00:40:09.159 align:center
And what you're looking for is

00:40:09.219 --> 00:40:12.382 align:center
try to find the waves, the

00:40:12.462 --> 00:40:14.064 align:center
way that the lines and the

00:40:14.164 --> 00:40:16.906 align:center
chords can overlap and create these

00:40:16.986 --> 00:40:19.589 align:center
beautiful musical shapes which is really

00:40:19.609 --> 00:40:21.231 align:center
the essence of what this playing

00:40:21.271 --> 00:40:22.532 align:center
ballads is like.

00:40:23.133 --> 00:40:24.574 align:center
So I'm going to play one

00:40:24.654 --> 00:40:27.577 align:center
chorus of improvisation over the changes

00:40:27.657 --> 00:40:29.659 align:center
of Campinas by Hermeto Pascual.

00:40:29.879 --> 00:40:30.480 align:center
Here it goes.

00:40:31.710 --> 00:40:34.130 align:center
One, two,

00:40:51.173 --> 00:43:06.576 align:center
three,

00:43:06.656 --> 00:43:07.236 align:center
four, goes back

00:43:07.296 --> 00:43:07.796 align:center
into the head.

00:43:08.436 --> 00:43:09.556 align:center
You will notice that one thing

00:43:09.596 --> 00:43:11.897 align:center
that I usually steer away from

00:43:11.937 --> 00:43:14.517 align:center
is to play the root in

00:43:14.577 --> 00:43:15.217 align:center
my melodies.

00:43:16.017 --> 00:43:17.738 align:center
And the melody sometimes, the written

00:43:17.798 --> 00:43:19.478 align:center
melody sometimes has the root, but

00:43:19.518 --> 00:43:20.778 align:center
it's just as a moment of

00:43:20.838 --> 00:43:21.978 align:center
like rest.

00:43:22.138 --> 00:43:23.399 align:center
So yes, you can play the

00:43:23.459 --> 00:43:25.759 align:center
root, but if you stay only

00:43:25.839 --> 00:43:28.460 align:center
arpeggio in the primary chords, you're

00:43:28.500 --> 00:43:29.940 align:center
gonna get bored and your listeners

00:43:29.980 --> 00:43:31.140 align:center
will get bored very soon.

00:43:31.400 --> 00:43:32.881 align:center
So what we're trying to do

00:43:32.941 --> 00:43:35.223 align:center
here is to create the opening

00:43:35.704 --> 00:43:36.545 align:center
of these chords.

00:43:37.165 --> 00:43:38.126 align:center
So if a chord is a

00:43:38.627 --> 00:43:39.527 align:center
F major 7,

00:43:42.430 --> 00:43:43.031 align:center
I am thinking

00:43:43.111 --> 00:43:44.452 align:center
of the G major triad, C

00:43:46.374 --> 00:43:51.859 align:center
major triad, D minor.

00:43:52.699 --> 00:43:53.820 align:center
Yes, it's sort of beautiful.

00:43:53.880 --> 00:43:56.002 align:center
Even D minor.

00:43:57.203 --> 00:43:59.405 align:center
See, the A minor.

00:44:00.086 --> 00:44:02.128 align:center
And most of those, a couple

00:44:02.168 --> 00:44:03.609 align:center
of them do, but they don't

00:44:03.629 --> 00:44:04.550 align:center
have the F in them.

00:44:05.250 --> 00:44:06.611 align:center
So leave the F on the

00:44:06.671 --> 00:44:08.593 align:center
bottom and use all the other

00:44:08.693 --> 00:44:11.396 align:center
notes to expand and to create

00:44:11.556 --> 00:44:12.718 align:center
out of this something that's going

00:44:12.738 --> 00:44:14.920 align:center
to be really beautiful and inspiring,

00:44:15.500 --> 00:44:15.781 align:center
right?

00:44:17.242 --> 00:44:19.624 align:center
Oh, so yeah, so continuing here,

00:44:20.866 --> 00:44:23.588 align:center
this tune, I mean, I learned

00:44:23.649 --> 00:44:25.150 align:center
this piece of music from him

00:44:25.230 --> 00:44:26.151 align:center
in 1977.

00:44:26.271 --> 00:44:28.734 align:center
So it's been, it's going to

00:44:28.754 --> 00:44:30.555 align:center
be 46 years since I learned

00:44:30.575 --> 00:44:31.597 align:center
this piece of music and I'm

00:44:31.637 --> 00:44:33.879 align:center
telling you, I have not gotten

00:44:33.899 --> 00:44:35.080 align:center
to the end of it yet.

00:44:35.300 --> 00:44:37.525 align:center
And I play this tune almost

00:44:37.625 --> 00:44:37.986 align:center
daily.

00:44:38.066 --> 00:44:39.169 align:center
It's one of the favorite tunes

00:44:39.189 --> 00:44:40.332 align:center
that I play with my band,

00:44:40.492 --> 00:44:42.176 align:center
whether it's a trio or quintet

00:44:42.697 --> 00:44:44.461 align:center
or solo piano, I play this

00:44:44.582 --> 00:44:46.165 align:center
piece and I try to really

00:44:46.266 --> 00:44:48.010 align:center
get inside of it every time.

00:44:48.110 --> 00:44:49.293 align:center
And every time I think I

00:44:49.333 --> 00:44:50.496 align:center
get to the bottom of it,

00:44:51.197 --> 00:44:52.420 align:center
something else opens up.

00:44:52.580 --> 00:44:54.122 align:center
So I want you to treat

00:44:54.202 --> 00:44:56.145 align:center
this music, both of these compositions,

00:44:56.226 --> 00:44:57.568 align:center
not only that, but there's many

00:44:57.648 --> 00:44:59.310 align:center
other beautiful ballads in the world

00:44:59.390 --> 00:45:02.175 align:center
of jazz and even pop music

00:45:02.295 --> 00:45:03.957 align:center
that can be explored in this

00:45:04.037 --> 00:45:05.580 align:center
way because they were so well

00:45:05.660 --> 00:45:09.085 align:center
constructed that they have this multiple

00:45:09.105 --> 00:45:11.068 align:center
possibilities, like a good book that

00:45:11.108 --> 00:45:11.829 align:center
you want to read.

00:45:12.370 --> 00:45:13.532 align:center
You finish the book, you start

00:45:13.572 --> 00:45:15.114 align:center
reading it again because you realize

00:45:15.154 --> 00:45:17.137 align:center
that there's more there than you

00:45:17.177 --> 00:45:18.419 align:center
saw in the first reading, like

00:45:18.479 --> 00:45:18.880 align:center
a good...

00:45:19.070 --> 00:45:20.532 align:center
beautiful piece of art or a

00:45:20.612 --> 00:45:22.455 align:center
beautiful dish that just says I

00:45:22.535 --> 00:45:25.259 align:center
could eat this again because once

00:45:25.359 --> 00:45:27.302 align:center
is not enough you have you

00:45:27.362 --> 00:45:28.864 align:center
keep going deeper and deeper and

00:45:28.924 --> 00:45:30.606 align:center
deeper into it so the ability

00:45:31.087 --> 00:45:32.809 align:center
of your inner ear as a

00:45:32.869 --> 00:45:35.833 align:center
musician to accomplish this is that

00:45:35.894 --> 00:45:39.499 align:center
is a practice and Make sure

00:45:39.539 --> 00:45:41.141 align:center
you save enough time to kind

00:45:41.181 --> 00:45:43.044 align:center
of like explore this music in

00:45:43.084 --> 00:45:46.548 align:center
different ways bring different perspectives and

00:45:46.609 --> 00:45:47.690 align:center
by the way

00:45:47.720 --> 00:45:48.862 align:center
Now that I said all these

00:45:48.882 --> 00:45:50.746 align:center
things about not thinking in double

00:45:50.806 --> 00:45:52.248 align:center
time, if at one point after

00:45:52.309 --> 00:45:53.310 align:center
you've played it quite a bit,

00:45:53.371 --> 00:45:56.937 align:center
you want to switch to a

00:45:57.077 --> 00:45:59.121 align:center
slight section of double time, it's

00:45:59.201 --> 00:45:59.542 align:center
okay.

00:46:00.083 --> 00:46:02.147 align:center
Remember that there's a big difference

00:46:02.307 --> 00:46:04.331 align:center
between the whole, if you're playing

00:46:04.351 --> 00:46:05.894 align:center
with a band, everybody going like

00:46:05.914 --> 00:46:09.140 align:center
one, two, three, four.

00:46:16.900 --> 00:46:18.402 align:center
That's one thing, that's going into

00:46:18.422 --> 00:46:19.043 align:center
the double time.

00:46:19.063 --> 00:46:19.985 align:center
The other thing is when the

00:46:20.105 --> 00:46:21.007 align:center
pulse remains.

00:46:29.801 --> 00:46:31.764 align:center
So I played a fast line

00:46:32.405 --> 00:46:34.127 align:center
but that fast line did not

00:46:34.408 --> 00:46:39.175 align:center
interfere with that one.

00:46:39.195 --> 00:46:40.818 align:center
The pulse is still there even

00:46:40.878 --> 00:46:41.800 align:center
though there might be a little

00:46:41.840 --> 00:46:42.080 align:center
flirt.

00:47:14.380 --> 00:47:16.283 align:center
I'm just quoting parts of this

00:47:16.363 --> 00:47:18.005 align:center
melody, parts of the changes of

00:47:18.066 --> 00:47:20.289 align:center
compilers as examples of what I'm

00:47:20.329 --> 00:47:20.910 align:center
talking about.

00:47:21.010 --> 00:47:22.592 align:center
These are really good things to

00:47:22.692 --> 00:47:23.814 align:center
practice.

00:47:23.834 --> 00:47:26.939 align:center
These are ways to search and

00:47:27.019 --> 00:47:31.025 align:center
to really develop your own listening.

00:47:31.305 --> 00:47:33.208 align:center
The depth of your listening is

00:47:33.348 --> 00:47:35.071 align:center
one of the most precious things

00:47:35.151 --> 00:47:36.613 align:center
that you would ever work on.

00:47:37.435 --> 00:47:41.060 align:center
It's more important than...

00:47:41.480 --> 00:47:43.242 align:center
the technique of the fingers.

00:47:43.262 --> 00:47:44.603 align:center
The technique of the fingers is

00:47:44.664 --> 00:47:46.145 align:center
important, but not for this kind

00:47:46.185 --> 00:47:47.627 align:center
of playing.

00:47:47.647 --> 00:47:49.609 align:center
It's something that everything you worked

00:47:49.809 --> 00:47:52.112 align:center
on will help you to achieve

00:47:52.252 --> 00:47:54.034 align:center
this, but more important is for

00:47:54.074 --> 00:47:55.536 align:center
you to know when the lines

00:47:55.656 --> 00:47:58.179 align:center
should just wait and when you

00:47:58.219 --> 00:47:59.981 align:center
should breathe to make this music

00:48:00.121 --> 00:48:01.222 align:center
happen, right?

00:48:01.863 --> 00:48:04.345 align:center
So I'm gonna play it again.

00:48:05.166 --> 00:48:06.868 align:center
Again, I'm gonna take one more

00:48:06.968 --> 00:48:08.430 align:center
chorus over Campinas.

00:48:10.470 --> 00:48:12.010 align:center
And when I'm doing that, I'm

00:48:12.170 --> 00:48:13.931 align:center
also comping.

00:48:13.951 --> 00:48:15.871 align:center
So I'm comping myself and sometimes

00:48:15.931 --> 00:48:18.131 align:center
the solo becomes the comping because

00:48:18.191 --> 00:48:19.531 align:center
you can also play with chords.

00:48:19.551 --> 00:48:20.792 align:center
So I'll try to explore a

00:48:20.812 --> 00:48:21.812 align:center
little bit of that if I

00:48:21.872 --> 00:48:23.372 align:center
remember when I'm playing because once

00:48:23.392 --> 00:48:25.412 align:center
you go into that zone, the

00:48:25.472 --> 00:48:26.972 align:center
music takes you instead of you

00:48:26.992 --> 00:48:27.833 align:center
taking the music.

00:48:27.853 --> 00:48:30.013 align:center
So I'm gonna let this beautiful

00:48:30.053 --> 00:48:31.593 align:center
composition take me somewhere and then

00:48:31.633 --> 00:48:32.533 align:center
we'll see where you go from

00:48:33.173 --> 00:48:35.574 align:center
there, okay?

00:48:36.114 --> 00:49:12.679 align:center
One,

00:49:13.799 --> 00:49:34.642 align:center
two,

00:49:34.922 --> 00:50:06.547 align:center
three,

00:50:14.568 --> 00:51:33.360 align:center
four,

00:51:33.380 --> 00:51:34.760 align:center
and so...

00:51:34.570 --> 00:51:36.933 align:center
Hopefully you can see there how

00:51:37.534 --> 00:51:39.377 align:center
many possible ideas there are.

00:51:39.938 --> 00:51:41.520 align:center
And at times I'm bringing something.

00:51:42.241 --> 00:51:43.583 align:center
I have a comment from Steve

00:51:43.903 --> 00:51:45.566 align:center
Schuler here, saying, very nice piece.

00:51:45.606 --> 00:51:47.669 align:center
My first time hearing, so looking

00:51:47.749 --> 00:51:49.171 align:center
for artists to hear this by

00:51:49.211 --> 00:51:50.473 align:center
your suggestion would be good.

00:51:51.054 --> 00:51:51.755 align:center
Yes, thank you.

00:51:52.556 --> 00:51:53.718 align:center
Those are good suggestions.

00:51:53.798 --> 00:51:55.941 align:center
I think, I mean, I come

00:51:56.001 --> 00:51:57.904 align:center
from the school of Rometo Pasquale's

00:51:57.984 --> 00:51:58.865 align:center
music.

00:51:58.885 --> 00:52:00.207 align:center
So for me to be able

00:52:00.307 --> 00:52:02.390 align:center
to share this music with other...

00:52:02.440 --> 00:52:04.623 align:center
composers, with other pianists, with other

00:52:04.643 --> 00:52:05.183 align:center
musicians.

00:52:05.284 --> 00:52:05.764 align:center
It's great.

00:52:06.665 --> 00:52:08.167 align:center
Everybody that has shown this music

00:52:08.207 --> 00:52:09.188 align:center
too has loved it.

00:52:09.208 --> 00:52:11.932 align:center
So you cannot go wrong with

00:52:11.972 --> 00:52:13.694 align:center
this piece.

00:52:13.714 --> 00:52:16.197 align:center
It's a great piece to develop

00:52:16.257 --> 00:52:18.440 align:center
the technique of hearing changes.

00:52:19.621 --> 00:52:20.903 align:center
When you hear the changes in

00:52:20.963 --> 00:52:24.387 align:center
your inner ear, what you play

00:52:24.607 --> 00:52:26.109 align:center
is going to reflect the depth

00:52:26.189 --> 00:52:26.810 align:center
of your hearing.

00:52:27.500 --> 00:52:29.282 align:center
And the more you develop that

00:52:29.343 --> 00:52:30.664 align:center
depth, your playing is going to

00:52:30.724 --> 00:52:32.387 align:center
be deeper too, and it's going

00:52:32.407 --> 00:52:33.448 align:center
to be more inspiring.

00:52:33.809 --> 00:52:35.431 align:center
And people who are listening to

00:52:35.471 --> 00:52:36.893 align:center
you, they kind of follow.

00:52:36.913 --> 00:52:38.014 align:center
This is not like kind of

00:52:38.115 --> 00:52:40.658 align:center
background music, the elevator music, as

00:52:40.718 --> 00:52:42.080 align:center
we say, that kind of stays

00:52:42.100 --> 00:52:42.921 align:center
in the wallpaper.

00:52:43.542 --> 00:52:45.805 align:center
This is something that challenges not

00:52:45.885 --> 00:52:47.748 align:center
only the player, but also challenges

00:52:47.848 --> 00:52:48.469 align:center
the listener.

00:52:49.190 --> 00:52:50.652 align:center
Very important to be able to

00:52:50.792 --> 00:52:53.395 align:center
keep doing that as something that

00:52:54.217 --> 00:52:54.657 align:center
grows.

00:52:55.679 --> 00:52:56.720 align:center
As I said before,

00:52:57.320 --> 00:52:59.162 align:center
46 years later, I'm still growing

00:52:59.202 --> 00:52:59.843 align:center
with this music.

00:52:59.963 --> 00:53:01.705 align:center
This music is just like you

00:53:01.765 --> 00:53:02.345 align:center
work out.

00:53:02.405 --> 00:53:03.707 align:center
You take some weights and you

00:53:03.727 --> 00:53:04.908 align:center
kind of build up your muscles.

00:53:05.268 --> 00:53:06.590 align:center
You play this music to build

00:53:06.710 --> 00:53:09.232 align:center
up your hearing, not the muscles,

00:53:09.292 --> 00:53:11.995 align:center
but your perception and the depth

00:53:12.055 --> 00:53:12.936 align:center
of your perception.

00:53:13.056 --> 00:53:14.578 align:center
How deep can you listen to

00:53:14.638 --> 00:53:15.278 align:center
this music?

00:53:16.380 --> 00:53:17.421 align:center
It's a process.

00:53:17.961 --> 00:53:18.982 align:center
I'm not done with it.

00:53:19.142 --> 00:53:20.244 align:center
And I think you won't be

00:53:20.284 --> 00:53:21.145 align:center
either if you start.

00:53:21.225 --> 00:53:22.806 align:center
So great idea.

00:53:23.287 --> 00:53:24.048 align:center
And I think I'm going to

00:53:24.108 --> 00:53:25.970 align:center
close today by just playing the

00:53:26.010 --> 00:53:26.470 align:center
head out.

00:53:26.790 --> 00:53:29.514 align:center
just playing the melody as it

00:53:29.654 --> 00:53:31.758 align:center
is with my own interpretation, which

00:53:31.838 --> 00:53:32.899 align:center
is different every time.

00:53:32.940 --> 00:53:34.081 align:center
But hopefully this will be a

00:53:34.141 --> 00:53:35.564 align:center
way for you to inspire all

00:53:35.624 --> 00:53:37.266 align:center
of you to practice this music.

00:53:37.727 --> 00:53:39.570 align:center
Hayden has made the link available.

00:53:39.970 --> 00:53:41.092 align:center
And you would also get the

00:53:41.152 --> 00:53:43.636 align:center
lead-up keyboards afterwards with the MIDI

00:53:44.317 --> 00:53:46.481 align:center
information so you can also see

00:53:46.761 --> 00:53:48.063 align:center
what kind of voices I played,

00:53:48.083 --> 00:53:49.405 align:center
what kind of notes I chose.

00:53:50.086 --> 00:53:52.590 align:center
And you will see that I'm...

00:53:52.730 --> 00:53:54.793 align:center
As I said, also repeat that,

00:53:54.833 --> 00:53:57.858 align:center
that I'm avoiding the roots, because

00:53:57.878 --> 00:53:59.380 align:center
the moment you close the roots,

00:54:00.101 --> 00:54:01.783 align:center
there's like a short circuit.

00:54:01.803 --> 00:54:03.907 align:center
The tune closes on itself.

00:54:03.927 --> 00:54:05.909 align:center
So now, by avoiding the roots,

00:54:06.110 --> 00:54:07.592 align:center
you are going out of the

00:54:07.692 --> 00:54:09.615 align:center
window instead of locking the doors

00:54:09.675 --> 00:54:11.137 align:center
in the windows and closing the

00:54:11.217 --> 00:54:14.402 align:center
redundancy of the unison between melody

00:54:14.462 --> 00:54:15.283 align:center
and bass.

00:54:15.303 --> 00:54:16.585 align:center
You open it up and then

00:54:16.605 --> 00:54:18.047 align:center
you keep going, and you keep

00:54:18.108 --> 00:54:18.368 align:center
going.

00:54:18.408 --> 00:54:19.550 align:center
Where you stop, it's up to

00:54:19.610 --> 00:54:19.810 align:center
you.

00:54:20.060 --> 00:54:20.561 align:center
Okay?

00:54:21.162 --> 00:54:22.423 align:center
So I'm going to play the

00:54:22.483 --> 00:54:24.687 align:center
theme, the head out of Campinas

00:54:24.787 --> 00:54:26.189 align:center
by Armento Pascual and I hope

00:54:26.269 --> 00:54:28.212 align:center
everybody's enjoyed this live seminar.

00:54:28.692 --> 00:54:30.315 align:center
You can always send me messages

00:54:30.475 --> 00:54:31.677 align:center
on the chat and on the

00:54:31.737 --> 00:54:33.920 align:center
conversation on the site for Piano

00:54:33.960 --> 00:54:34.240 align:center
Groove.

00:54:34.280 --> 00:54:35.482 align:center
It's a pleasure to work with

00:54:35.542 --> 00:54:36.203 align:center
all of you here.

00:54:36.624 --> 00:54:37.785 align:center
I know there's people from all

00:54:37.845 --> 00:54:38.987 align:center
over the world and I'm so

00:54:39.047 --> 00:54:40.249 align:center
happy to be able to reach

00:54:40.369 --> 00:54:41.991 align:center
out to all of you and

00:54:42.071 --> 00:54:43.834 align:center
spread this beautiful music that we

00:54:43.894 --> 00:54:44.234 align:center
all love.

00:54:44.635 --> 00:54:44.975 align:center
Okay?

00:54:45.416 --> 00:54:47.138 align:center
So here goes Campinas as a

00:54:47.179 --> 00:54:48.240 align:center
theme head out.

00:57:43.220 --> 00:57:45.163 align:center
Thank you Amato Pasquale for writing

00:57:45.203 --> 00:57:46.365 align:center
such beautiful music.

00:57:46.525 --> 00:57:48.388 align:center
Actually, Amato Pasquale is on tour

00:57:48.428 --> 00:57:50.310 align:center
in the United States this week

00:57:50.350 --> 00:57:50.891 align:center
and the next.

00:57:50.931 --> 00:57:52.674 align:center
So if you are anywhere near

00:57:52.694 --> 00:57:54.276 align:center
where he's coming, he's going to

00:57:54.296 --> 00:57:56.539 align:center
be 87 years old next month

00:57:56.680 --> 00:57:58.322 align:center
and he's playing with this amazing

00:57:58.402 --> 00:57:58.723 align:center
band.

00:57:59.283 --> 00:58:01.387 align:center
I'm in Seattle and actually my

00:58:01.447 --> 00:58:02.288 align:center
band is going to open for

00:58:02.348 --> 00:58:05.412 align:center
his band on Tuesday, the 31st,

00:58:05.493 --> 00:58:07.556 align:center
the 30th of May, 30th of

00:58:07.656 --> 00:58:08.577 align:center
May on Tuesday.

00:58:08.597 --> 00:58:10.280 align:center
I believe that's the date.

00:58:10.300 --> 00:58:10.640 align:center
Anyway.

00:58:10.800 --> 00:58:11.922 align:center
Check it out, check out my

00:58:11.982 --> 00:58:13.905 align:center
website, check out Hermeto's website, and

00:58:13.925 --> 00:58:15.348 align:center
of course, check out Piano Groove's

00:58:15.368 --> 00:58:16.930 align:center
website, where there's so much great

00:58:16.950 --> 00:58:17.692 align:center
information is.

00:58:17.732 --> 00:58:19.595 align:center
I'd like to thank everybody for

00:58:19.695 --> 00:58:20.697 align:center
being part of it.

00:58:23.201 --> 00:58:24.724 align:center
Found your recording on Apple Music.

00:58:24.744 --> 00:58:25.806 align:center
Oh, you did find a recording

00:58:25.866 --> 00:58:26.647 align:center
of me on this, too.

00:58:26.687 --> 00:58:27.108 align:center
Thank you.

00:58:27.729 --> 00:58:29.552 align:center
And thanks, Hayden, for making it

00:58:29.592 --> 00:58:30.914 align:center
possible for us to do this,

00:58:31.054 --> 00:58:32.417 align:center
and I will see you all

00:58:33.138 --> 00:58:34.340 align:center
next...

00:58:34.430 --> 00:58:34.812 align:center
time.

00:58:34.872 --> 00:58:35.937 align:center
Next month we have a new

00:58:36.018 --> 00:58:37.424 align:center
live seminar, a new subject.

00:58:37.465 --> 00:58:38.630 align:center
Always a pleasure to be here

00:58:38.670 --> 00:58:39.575 align:center
sharing music with you.

00:58:40.037 --> 00:58:41.002 align:center
So thanks everybody.

00:58:41.042 --> 00:58:41.846 align:center
Have a great day.

00:58:42.569 --> 00:58:42.770 align:center
Bye.

